gynecology and obstetrics medical project, gynecology journal, obstetrics, gynecologic oncology, reproductive medicine, gynecological endoscopy, ultrasonography, gynecology articles

Ginekologia i Poloznictwo
ISSN 1896-3315 e-ISSN 1898-0759

Research - (2024) Volume 19, Issue 3

The impact of serum vitamin D on fertility status in a sample of Iraqi women

Hala Razzaq Jasim1* and Lina Muhssen Atyia2
 
*Correspondence: Hala Razzaq Jasim, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kufa University, Kufa, Iraq,

Received: 02-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. gpmp-24-148212; Editor assigned: 03-Sep-2024, Pre QC No. P-148212; Reviewed: 14-Sep-2024, QC No. Q-148212; Revised: 21-Sep-2024, Manuscript No. R-148212; Published: 30-Sep-2024

Author info »

Abstract

Background: The existence of vitamin D metabolizing enzymes and receptors in female tissues of reproductive origin has been documented by a list of studies. In addition, low levels of vitamin D have been observed in women with polycystic ovary syndrome with sub-fertility, and vitamin D supplementation for those women has been associated with improved menstrual irregularities, metabolic derangements, and fertility outcomes.

Aim of the study: The present case-control study was aimed at comparing the serum vitamin D level of a sample of subfertile Iraqi women to that of a control sample of pregnant women.

Subjects and methods: The current case-control study enrolled 54 subfertile women, and 50 fertile women recruited from the obstetrics and gynecology department at Pediatric and Maternity Teaching Hospital, Adiwaniyah Province, Iraq. The serum level of vitamin D was measured and compared between the two groups.

Results: The mean level of the subfertile group was higher in a significant manner when compared to that of the control group: 22.79 ± 4.64 ng/ml vs. 27.35 ± 8.60 ng/ml, respectively (p=0.001). In addition, the proportion of women in the subfertile group with vitamin D deficiency was higher than that reported in the control group, 40.0% vs. 25.9%, respectively, but this difference was not significant (p=0.126).

Conclusion: Low serum vitamin D is significantly linked to subfertility in Iraqi women during reproductive age. Therefore, we recommend adopting the strategy of vitamin D supplementation for Iraqi women during reproductive age to reduce the health burden of sub-fertility in our community.

Keywords

Sub-fertility; Iraq; Vitamin D; Deficiency

Introduction

Deficiency and insufficiency of vitamin D have been linked during the past few decades to a number of health issues worldwide (1). For instance, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular disorders, malignant diseases, obstetric complications, musculoskeletal defects, degenerative neurological abnormalities, and fertility issues [1-3]. Evidence about the association between vitamin D insufficiency and fertility physiology has been withdrawn from experimental studies on animal models as well as a number of clinical trials [3-5]. The role of vitamin D was demonstrated to modulate reproductive activities in both men and women [68].

The existence of vitamin D metabolizing enzymes and receptors in female tissues of reproductive origin has been documented by a list of studies [4]. In addition, low levels of vitamin D have been observed in women with polycystic ovary syndrome with subfertility, and vitamin D supplementation for those women has been associated with improved menstrual irregularities, metabolic derangements, and fertility outcomes [9,10]. Moreover, the process of steroidogenesis concerning progesterone and estradiol in women has been shown to be influenced by vitamin D, and lower levels of serum vitamin D were associated with subfertility [11].

Recent research on vitamin D in the Middle East has delved into its impact beyond calcium regulation, focusing on metabolic diseases like metabolic syndrome, hypothyroidism, and diabetes mellitus [12-14]. Human and animal studies linking vitamin D to fertility have focused on spermatogenesis, folliculogenesis, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and endometrial thickness. The results of these studies were controversial, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the role of vitamin D in human fertility [15-18]. The link between vitamin D and women's fertility needs further research in our country because of the cultural issue relating to the pattern of female dressing necessitating covering almost the whole body, making the sun exposure, which is by far the most important source of vitamin D production, difficult.

In addition, research work on this issue is still limited in Iraq. Therefore, the present case-control study was aimed at comparing the serum vitamin D level of a sample of subfertile Iraqi women to that of a control sample of pregnant women.

Subjects and Methods

The current study was designed according to the case-control pattern of observational studies. The cases were 54 subfertile women. The inclusion criteria were: infertile women with primary or secondary infertility aging between 18 and 40 years; women with female factors of infertility or an unexplained cause; and women without a history of chronic medical illness in addition to a normal basal FSH level (≤ 14 mIU/mL). The exclusion criteria were: women older than 40 years; women with a history of male factor infertility or chronic medical illness; and women refusing to be enrolled in the study. Control cases were 50 fertile women with an age range of 18 to 40 years without a history of any chronic medical illness. Those women were recruited from obstetrics and gynecology department at Pediatric and Maternity Teaching Hospital, Adiwaniyah Province, Iraq. The period of study extended from January 2023 to December 2023. Ethical approval for this study was issued by the ethical committee for clinical research belonging to University of Al-Qadisiyah. Participants were all asked to give written consent to be enrolled in this study.

Data collection

Variables include demographics (age and body mass index), types, and causes of infertility. Responses to the following questions were reported: do you practice exposure to the sun daily and regularly for at least 30 minutes per day, and do you eat vitamin D-rich food items regularly? Blood samples were withdrawn from each participant and sent to the laboratory of the hospital in order to measure serum vitamin D levels and serum hormonal levels, including cycle day 2 estradiol, Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH), Luteinizing Hormone (LH), prolactin hormone, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), and Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH). Serum 25 (OH) vitamin D was assessed using Cobas e602 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using an immunoassay with ElectroChemiLuminiscence (ECL) technology with a lower detection limit of 4 ng/ml. In this study, vitamin D deficiency was considered at serum levels of less than 20 ng/mL [19]. Serum hormones were measured on a Roche-Elecsys 2010 (Germany) analyzer based on the principle of electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.

Data analysis

Data was analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Frequencies were presented as percentages (%) and continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Chi-square was done to elicit differences in frequencies between cases and controls. Independent t-test was done to compare differences among continuous variables. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the women enrolled in the study are shown in Tab. 1. The mean age showed no significant difference (p=0.575) when contrasted between the sub-fertile group and the control group, 28.28 ± 4.09 years vs. 28.74 ± 4.25 years, respectively. There was also no significant difference in mean Body Mass Index (BMI) (p=0.135) between study groups, 28.86 ± 3.43 kg/m2 vs. 27.67 ± 4.53 kg/m2, respectively. With respect to type of infertility, the subfertile group included 29 (58.0%) women with primary infertility and 21 (42.0%) women with secondary infertility; the control group included 32 (59.5%) women with primary infertility and 22 (40.7%) women with secondary infertility. There was no significant difference in the proportions of types of infertility between study groups (p=0.896). In addition, there was no significant difference in mean duration of infertility between study groups (p=0.800), 3.51 ± 1.53 years vs. 3.59 ± 1.76 years, respectively.

Characteristic Sub-fertile group
n = 50
Control group
n = 54
p
Age (years)
Mean ± SD 28.28 ± 4.09 28.74 ± 4.25 0.575 I
NS
Range 20-35 22-35
BMI (kg/m2)
Mean  ± SD 28.86 ± 3.43 27.67 ± 4.53 0.135 I
NS
Range 20 -35 20 -40
Normal weight 1 (2.0 %) 6 (11.1 %) -
Overweight 22 (44.0 %) 24 (44.4 %) -
Obese 27 (54.0 %) 24 (44.4 %) -
Type of infertility
Primary 29 (58.0 %) 32 (59.3 %) 0.896 C
NS
Secondary 21 (42.0 %) 22 (40.7 %)
Duration of infertility (years)
Mean  ± SD 3.51 ± 1.53 3.59 ± 1.76 0.800 I
NS
Range 1 -8 1 -8

Tab. 1. Demographic characteristics of women enrolled in the study.

Responses to questions assessing vitamin D acquisition habits are shown in Tab. 2. Responses to the question “Do you practice exposure to the sun daily and regularly for at least 30 minutes per day?” showed no significant variation between the sub-fertile group and the control group (p=0.633), and the “yes” response was reported as 38.0% and 42.6% in the groups, respectively. Responses to the question “Do you eat vitamin D-rich food items regularly?” showed no significant variation between the sub-fertile group and the control group (p = 0.640), and the “yes” response was reported as 78.0% and 74.1% in the two groups, respectively.

Characteristic Sub-fertile group
n = 50
Control group
n = 54
p
Do you practice exposure to sun daily and regularly for at least 30 minutes per-day
Yes 19 (38.0 %) 23 (42.6 %) 0.633 C
NS
No 31 (62.0 %) 31 (57.4 %)
Do you eat vitamin D rich food items regularly
Yes 39 (78.0 %) 40 (74.1 %) 0.640 C
NS
No 11 (22.0 %) 14 (25.9 %)

Tab. 2. Response to questions assessing vitamin D acquisition habits.

Serum hormonal levels are shown in Tab. 3. There was no significant difference in mean serum hormonal levels between the sub-fertile group and the control group (p>0.05). The serum vitamin D level contrasted between the subfertile group and the control group is shown in Tab. 4. The mean level of the subfertile group was higher in a significant manner when compared to that of the control group: 22.79 ± 4.64 ng/ml vs. 27.35 ± 8.60 ng/ml, respectively (p=0.001). In addition, the proportion of women in the subfertile group with vitamin D deficiency was higher than that reported in the control group, 40.0% vs. 25.9%, respectively, but this difference was not significant (p=0.126).

Characteristic Sub-fertile group
n = 50
Control group
n = 54
p
Estradiol (E2) (pg/ml)
Mean ± SD 41.04 ± 23.42 37.95 ± 12.56 0.491 I
NS
Range 11.79 -70.7 20 -68.75
Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) (mIU/ml
Mean ± SD 6.41 ± 2.07 6.09 ± 1.54 0.270 I
NS
Range 4.3 -9.2 1.78 -10.42
Luteinizing Hormone (LH) (mIU/ml)
Mean ± SD 5.13 ± 2.11 5.06 ± 2.32 0.237 I
NS
Range 1.78 -9.3 0.31 -13.9
Prolactin (ng/ml)
Mean ± SD 16.59 ±7.19 14.85 ± 5.91 0.325 I
NS
Range 5.2 -35.1 2.7 -30.05
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) (mIU/ml)
Mean ± SD 2.05 ± 0.55 2.17 ± 0.81 0.508 I
NS
Range 1.1 -3.2 0.75 -6.1
Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) (ng/ml)
Mean ± SD 6.96 ± 1.93 6.41 ± 3.52 0.341 I
NS
Range 4.04 -11.3 1.47 -10.84

Tab. 3. Serum hormonal levels.

Characteristic Sub-fertile group
n = 50
Control group
n = 54
p
Vitamin-D (ng/ml)
Mean ±SD 22.79 ±4.64 27.35 ±8.60 0.001 I
***
Range 13.1 -30.8 13.6 -39.9
Deficiency 20 (40.0 %) 14 (25.9 %) 0.126 C
NS
No deficiency 30 (60.0 %) 40 (74.1 %)

Tab. 4.  Serum vitamin D level contrasted between sub-fertile group and control group.

Discussion

The problem of vitamin D deficiency has been recently discussed in Iraqi medical literature, and it has been linked to a number of medical conditions [20]. This problem in Iraqi women within the reproductive age range has been linked to religious and cultural behaviors relating to women dressing in such a way that it limits sun exposure, which is a major source of vitamin D [21]. 1. Nevertheless, despite this explanation, the majority of Iraqis make an effort to steer clear of direct sunlight due to the extreme heat in the area (exceeding 50 ℃ in the summer, which lasts a considerable length of time). This underscores the necessity for further research on the impact of vitamin D deficiency on fertility in Iraq [20].

In addition, the problem of infertility is becoming increasingly recognized in our community [20]. Linking infertility to vitamin D deficiency in Iraqi women has been studied, and a statistically significant impact has been observed [20]. In the present study, the mean level of serum vitamin D showed a significant difference between the subfertile group and the control group; the level was lower significantly in the subfertile group in comparison with the control group. In addition, we observed more frequent proportions of women with vitamin D deficiency (serum level of <20 ng/ml) to be associated with sub-fertility.

Nevertheless, we observed no significant difference in the habit of daily sun exposure or in the habit of taking vitamin D-rich food on a regular basis between the groups in the study. Therefore, vitamin D deficiency in women during reproductive age may be due to reasons other than sun exposure or dietary habits. There are reports that link vitamin D deficiency to genetic factors. Indeed, several observational studies have evaluated the association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in vitamin D-related genes and vitamin D levels [22]. For that reason, we recommend future studies be focused on the link between genetic influence and vitamin D serum levels in Iraqi subfertile women.

The significantly lower vitamin D level seen in the subfertile group is indeed in accordance with several previous reports [3,20]. Adequate levels of vitamin D are known to positively impact fertility and can potentially enhance the chances of a successful pregnancy. Numerous studies have associated vitamin D insufficiency with a higher probability of preterm birth, gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, and bacterial vaginosis [23-26].

The significance of vitamin D production at the feto-maternal interface is emphasized by the presence of α-hydroxylase in the decidua and placenta [27-29]. In general, vitamin D supports placental growth and function by regulating placental calcium transport and displaying immunomodulatory effects, which are crucial for sustaining pregnancy [30]. During early pregnancy, the rapid appearance of VDR and α-hydroxylase CYP27B1 in the decidua and placenta plays a vital role in the role of vitamin D in development, including implantation and placental growth [31-33]. Vitamin D binding to VDR has been demonstrated to regulate key target genes, such as HOXA10, that are necessary for endometrial development, uterine receptivity, and implantation [34,35].

Conclusion

Low serum vitamin D is significantly linked to subfertility in Iraqi women during reproductive age. Therefore, we recommend adopting the strategy of vitamin D supplementation for Iraqi women during reproductive age to reduce the health burden of sub-fertility in our community.

Acknowledgement

We, the authors of the current study, would like to express our deep thanks and appreciation to all the women who took part in the study.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest is to be declared by the authors of this study.

Authors' Contribution

(A) Study Design · (B) Data Collection . (C) Statistical Analysis · (D) Data Interpretation · (E) Manuscript Preparation · (F) Literature Search · (G) No Fund Collection

References

  1. Pludowski P, Holick MF, Pilz S, et al. Vitamin D effects on musculoskeletal health, immunity, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, cancer, fertility, pregnancy, dementia and mortality-a review of recent evidenceAutoimmun Rev. 2013;12(10):976-989.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Zmijewski MA. Vitamin D and Human HealthInt J Mol Sci. 2019;20(1):145.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Al-Jaroudi D, Al-Banyan N, Aljohani NJ, et al. Vitamin D deficiency among subfertile women: case-control studyGynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(4):272-275.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Lerchbaum E, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Vitamin D and fertility: a systematic reviewEur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(5):765-778.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Kwiecinksi GG, Petrie GI, DeLuca HF. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 restores fertility of vitamin D-deficient female ratsAm J Physiol. 1989;256(4 Pt 1):E483-E487.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. Banks N, Sun F, Krawetz SA, et al. Male vitamin D status and male factor infertilityFertil Steril. 2021;116(4):973-979.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Cito G, Cocci A, Micelli E, et al. Vitamin D and Male Fertility: An Updated ReviewWorld J Mens Health. 2020;38(2):164-177.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Voulgaris N, Papanastasiou L, Piaditis G, et al. Vitamin D and aspects of female fertilityHormones (Athens). 2017;16(1):5-21.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Mohan A, Haider R, Fakhor H, et al. Vitamin D and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a reviewAnn Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(7):3506-3511.
  18. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  19. Morgante G, Darino I, Spanò A, et al. PCOS Physiopathology and Vitamin D Deficiency: Biological Insights and Perspectives for TreatmentJ Clin Med. 2022;11(15):4509.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  21. Harmon QE, Kissell K, Jukic AMZ, et al. Vitamin D and Reproductive Hormones Across the Menstrual Cycle. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(2):413-423.
  22. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  23. Ashok T, Palyam V, Azam AT, et al. Relationship Between Vitamin D and Thyroid: An EnigmaCureus. 2022;14(1):e21069.
  24. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  25. Abugoukh TM, Al Sharaby A, Elshaikh AO, et al. Does Vitamin D Have a Role in Diabetes?Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30432.
  26. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  27. Abboud M, Rizk R, Haidar S, et al. Association between Serum Vitamin D and Metabolic Syndrome in a Sample of Adults in LebanonNutrients. 2023;15(5):1129.
  28. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  29. Luk J, Torrealday S, Neal Perry G, et al. Relevance of vitamin D in reproductionHum Reprod. 2012;27(10):3015-3027.
  30. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  31. Maghsoumi-Norouzabad L, Zare Javid A, Mansoori A, et al. Evaluation of the effect of vitamin D supplementation on spermatogram, seminal and serum levels of oxidative stress indices in asthenospermia infertile men: a study protocol for a triple-blind, randomized controlled trialNutr J. 2021;20(1):49.
  32. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  33. Asadi M, Matin N, Frootan M, et al. Vitamin D improves endometrial thickness in PCOS women who need intrauterine insemination: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trialArch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(4):865-870.
  34. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  35. Firouzabadi RD, Rahmani E, Rahsepar M, et al. Value of follicular fluid vitamin D in predicting the pregnancy rate in an IVF program. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(1):201-206.
  36. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  37. Amrein K, Scherkl M, Hoffmann M, et al. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: an update on the current status worldwideEur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74(11):1498-1513.
  38. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  39. Majid MA, Hassan WN, Ridha AF. Prevalence of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (Vitamin D) Deficiency in a Group of Infertile Women from Baghdad CityBiochem Res Int. 2023;2023:6597730.
  40. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  41. Green RJ, Samy G, Miqdady MS, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in Africa and the Middle East, despite year-round sunny daysS Afr Med J. 2015;105(7):603-605.
  42. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  43. Tomei S, Singh P, Mathew R, et al. The Role of Polymorphisms in Vitamin D-Related Genes in Response to Vitamin D SupplementationNutrients. 2020;12(9):2608.
  44. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  45. Bodnar LM, Platt RW, Simhan HN. Early-pregnancy vitamin D deficiency and risk of preterm birth subtypesObstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):439-447.
  46. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  47. Zhang MX, Pan GT, Guo JF, et al. Vitamin D Deficiency Increases the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Observational StudiesNutrients. 2015;7(10):8366-8375.
  48. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  49. Bodnar LM, Krohn MA, Simhan HN. Maternal vitamin D deficiency is associated with bacterial vaginosis in the first trimester of pregnancyJ Nutr. 2009;139(6):1157-1161.
  50. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  51. Bodnar LM, Simhan HN, Catov JM, et al. Maternal vitamin D status and the risk of mild and severe preeclampsiaEpidemiology. 2014;25(2):207-214.
  52. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  53. Zehnder D, Bland R, Williams MC, et al. Extrarenal expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1 -hydroxylaseJ Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(2):888–894.
  54. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  55. Gray TK, Lester GE, Lorenc RS. Evidence for extra-renal 1 α-hydroxylation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 in pregnancy. Science. 1979;204(4399):1311-3.
  56. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  57. A Sonuga A, O Sonuga O, A Oyeyemi O, et al. Hypovitaminosis D in pregnancy: implication for the risk of development of pregnancy complications. Int J Res Rep Gyn. 2022;5(3):161-71.
  58. Google Scholar

  59. Tamblyn JA, Hewison M, Wagner CL, et al. Immunological role of vitamin D at the maternal–fetal interface. J Endocrinol. 2015;224(3):R107-21.
  60. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  61. Lambert PW, Stern PH, Avioli RC, et al. Evidence for extrarenal production of 1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D in man. J Clin Invest. 1982;69(3):722-725.
  62. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  63. Shin JS, Choi MY, Longtine MS, et al. Vitamin D effects on pregnancy and the placenta. Placenta. 2010;31(12):1027-1034.
  64. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  65. Stenhouse C, Suva LJ, Gaddy D, et al. Phosphate, calcium, and vitamin D: key regulators of fetal and placental development in mammals. Recent Adv Animal Nutr Metab. 2022:77-107.
  66. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  67. Du H, Daftary GS, Lalwani SI, et al. Direct regulation of HOXA10 by 1, 25-(OH) 2D3 in human myelomonocytic cells and human endometrial stromal cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2005;19(9):2222-2233.
  68. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  69. Saheb HA, Abbas FG, Alhassani ZK, et al. Etanercept’s Protective Effect Against Lung Inflammation Caused by Polymicrobial Sepsis Induced by CLP in Male Rats. Azerb Pharm Pharmacother J. 2023;22:11-14.
  70. Google Scholar

Author Info

Hala Razzaq Jasim1* and Lina Muhssen Atyia2
 
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kufa University, Kufa, Iraq
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Al-Diwaniyah Child and Maternity Hospital, Al-Qadisiya, Iraq
 

Copyright:This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.