gynecology and obstetrics medical project, gynecology journal, obstetrics, gynecologic oncology, reproductive medicine, gynecological endoscopy, ultrasonography, gynecology articles

Ginekologia i Poloznictwo
ISSN 1896-3315 e-ISSN 1898-0759

Research Article - (2024) Volume 19, Issue 3

The comparison of the effects of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy in expectant pregnant women with non-small cell lung cancer

Wisam Hashim Baqer1, Ali A. Obais2, Entsar Hadi Jawad3 and Saif M. Hassan1*
 
*Correspondence: Saif M. Hassan, Department of Pharmacy, Al-Zarawi University College, Karbala, Iraq,

Received: 02-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. gpmp-24-144233; Editor assigned: 03-Aug-2024, Pre QC No. P-144233; Reviewed: 15-Aug-2024, QC No. Q-144233; Revised: 29-Aug-2024, Manuscript No. R-144233; Published: 30-Sep-2024

Author info »

Abstract

Introduction: While Radiation Therapy (RT) uses high-energy radiation to kill cancer cells, concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the application of chemotherapy with radiation treatment. Late toxicities are long-term side effects perhaps occurring months or even years after therapy ends.

Method: Linked to CCRT and RT alone, a retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of acute and late toxicities in women With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Among the immediate toxicity were leukopenia, hepatic and renal failure, nausea and vomiting, and neutropenia.

Results: Acute Toxicity; the CCRT group had much more occurrences of neutropenia than the RT group; rates of nausea and vomiting were also much higher in the CCRT group. Compared to acute CCRT and acute RT toxicities, both late CCRT and late RT toxicities displayed rather higher incidence of severe neutropenia, nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion: Our study shows that CCRT is more likely than radiation treatment to cause late-stage severe toxicity. Moreover, for both CCRT and RT, the significance of late toxicities especially late severe ones is stressed. These findings coincide with the given claim.

Keywords

Rectovaginal fistula; Obstetric fistula; Non-obstetric fistula

Introduction

Malignant tumors occurring during pregnancy have attracted greater spotlight since their significantly higher frequency and negative effects on mother and newborn outcomes. Secondly posing a major difficulty for making decisions for treatment are the developing ethical questions.ONE Although lung cancer's incidence during pregnancy is less than that of breast cancer, cervical cancer [1]. A collection of lung tumours includes adeno-carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma is known as Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). With half of all NSCLC cases linked to adenocarcinoma, this is the most often occurring form. Usually starting in the tracheobronchial tree, squamous cell carcinoma was once the most typically identified kind of cancer; but it is now more commonly discovered in the outer portions of the lung. High-energy ionizing radiation is used in Radiation Treatment (RT) to especially target and destroy cancer cells [2,3]. Combining chemotherapy and radiation treatment for a more aggressive approach to cancer treatment helps to improve therapy effectiveness. On normal tissues, this mix can, however, have major negative consequences that affect the patient's quality of life. Thus, a key component of individualized medicine is precisely forecasting and controlling these side effects either before or during the early phases of treatment [4]. Radiotherapy and CCRT can lead to variable levels of acute leukopenia, liver and kidney failure, nausea and vomiting in NSCLC patients, which might increase the risk of foetus abnormality and potentially delay treatment [5]. The goal of this study was analysed and contrast the immediate and long-term side effects of radiation treatment with Chemotherapy And Radiation Therapy (CCRT) in pregnant woman.

Methods

A prospective study is studied the risk of acute and late toxicities of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and radiotherapy alone in woman patients of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) between January 11, 2023, to February 1, 2024, the patients were followed up from numerous government and commercial hospitals or institutions. Patients’ therapy by the CCRT group includes varied dosages and durations of chemotherapy according to protocol. For patients in the radiation group, the recommended dose typically varied between 50 and 60 Gy. Each week, patients got clinical examinations, chest x-rays, and abdomen ultrasounds. In all patients, treatment failures were defined as locoregional or remote and adverse effects were examined and rated. Patients whose already on chemotherapy or radiation, they had chronic diseases or other types of cancer, and weight loss of above 20%, were excluded from the study. Included criteria for acute toxicity, such as at least one of the following: leukopenia, liver and renal failure, nausea and vomiting, neutropenia, while the neutropenia, and nausea and vomiting for late toxicity.

Statistically analytical study

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.0 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA) was used in all analyses for this project. GraphPad Prism 8.1 (GraphPad software, San Diego, CA) produced graphs. A one-way ANOVA test for dependent samples with multiple testing was used to evaluate variations between the RT and CCRT groups. Correcting for multiple testing for both CCRT and RT groups, pairwise comparisons between acute and late were computed with Wilcoxon pairwise test corrected for multiple testing.

Results

We allocated two hundred pregnant women to radiation alone, and another two hundred received combination treatment. The group undergoing combination therapy also received three concurrent chemotherapy cycles along with radiation treatment. Patients in the radiation treatment group averaged between 30 and 45 years old; those in the CCRT group ranged in age from 25 to 45 years old. As showed in Tab. 1. Concurrent Chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) and radiation (RT) were evaluated and the CCRT group had notably higher frequencies of nausea and vomiting (44.3% vs. 14.2%), neutropenia (12.4% vs. 1.3%), and leukopenia (32.8% vs. 1.9%. In the CCRT group, the data also revealed a clear increase in the probability of acute nausea/vomiting (odds ratio [OR] =3.1, P<0.05), neutropenia (OR=9.5, P<0.05), and leukopenia (OR=17.3, P<0.05) compared to the RT group. This implies that compared to those getting RT alone, patients having CCRT are much more likely to suffer severe side effects Tab. 1. and Fig. 1.

Treatment Group P value Odd Ratio
CCRT % RT alone %
Acute toxicities
Nausea and vomiting 44.3 14.2 <0.05 3.1
Neutropenia 14.4 1.3 <0.05 9.5
leukopenia 32.8 1.9 <0.05 17.3
Liver and kidney dysfunction 0.9 0 0.19 -

Tab. 1. Shows the variations in acute toxicity rates between the two treatment modalities and explain the percentage of acute toxicity events in a sample of 200 cases, so contrasting the incidence of acute toxicity between patients who underwent Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and those who underwent Radiotherapy (RT) alone.

ginekologia-toxicity

Fig. 1. The incidence of acute toxicity between patients who underwent Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and those who underwent Radiotherapy (RT) alone.

The data shows that pregnant women in the Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) group experienced a significantly higher incidence of certain late toxicities compared to those in the radiotherapy (RT) group. Specifically, the CCRT group had higher rates of nausea and vomiting (44.5% vs. 21.6%), neutropenia (32.1% vs. 5.5%), and leukopenia (45.5% vs. 3.2%). Furthermore, the data also indicated a clear increase in the likelihood of experiencing acute nausea and vomiting (odds ratio [OR]=2.1, P<0.05), neutropenia (OR=5.85, P<0.05), and leukopenia (OR=14.2, P<0.05) in the CCRT group compared to the RT group. These findings suggest that patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be at a higher risk of experiencing these specific late toxicities compared to those receiving radiotherapy alone. The detailed information is presented in Tab. 2. and Fig. 2.

Treatment Group P value Odd Ratio
CCRT % RT alone %
Late toxicities
Nausea and vomiting 44.5 21.6 <0.05 2.1
Neutropenia 32.1 5.5 <0.05 5.85
Leukopenia 45.5 3.2 <0.05 14.2
Liver and kidney dysfunction 1.7 0.3 0.142 -

Tab. 2. Compare the differences in late toxicity rates between the two treatment approaches and describe the fraction of acute toxicity events in a dataset of 200 cases. This will involve evaluating the frequency of acute toxicity in individuals who got Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) against those who had Radiotherapy (RT) alone.

ginekologia-chemoradiotherapy

Fig. 2. The incidence of late toxicity between patients who underwent Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and those who underwent Radiotherapy (RT) alone.

Discussion

The findings suggest that undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing acute toxicities such as nausea/vomiting, leukopenia, and neutropenia when compared to receiving radiotherapy alone. Several factors have been observed to be closely linked to the side effects caused by radiation therapy, including the accumulated dose, radioactive source, target volume, dose intensity, and the occurrence of xerostomia. Furthermore, the repeated use of cytotoxic agents in chemotherapy can result in damage to endothelial tissues, connective tissue epithelium, and bone marrow [5,6].

As a result, it appears that concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) is connected to a higher risk of Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and bone marrow damage compared to radiotherapy alone. In clinical practice, an anti-neoplastic drug is typically administered one week after the commencement of radiotherapy.

The specific comparison of side effects between acute and late radiation therapy (RT) toxicities is not addressed in the provided search results. It is important to note that the incidence and severity of side effects can vary depending on the individual patient, the specific treatment regimen, and other clinical factors [7,8]. Acute side effects of RT typically occur during or immediately after treatment and may include skin irritation, fatigue, and nausea. Late side effects, on the other hand, may develop months or even years after treatment and can include issues such as fibrosis, lymphedema, and secondary malignancies. It's essential for healthcare providers to carefully monitor and manage these potential side effects to ensure the best possible outcomes for patients undergoing RT [9,10].

Conclusion

The main goal of the present work is to evaluate and contrast in pregnant patients the acute and late effects of radiation treatment alone against CCRT. The findings show that CCRT causes late severe toxicity more likely than radiation therapy. For both CCRT and RT, late toxicities are therefore more important than acute ones.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Ethical Clearance

The Ethical Committee of the Karbala Health Directorate has approved a protocol for a research project with 2-8-2023. Furthermore, the patients expressed verbal assent prior to the sampling. During sampling, health safety was under focus. This study followed Iraqi Ministry of Health Ethics Committee guidelines and conformed with all national policies.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared there is no conflict of interest.

Authors' Contribution

(A) Study Design · (B) Data Collection . (C) Statistical Analysis · (D) Data Interpretation · (E) Manuscript Preparation · (F) Literature Search · (G) No Fund Collection

References

  1. Yeh SA. Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Semin Plast Surg. 2010;24(2):127-136.
  2. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  3. Laiakis EC, Mak TD, Anizan S, et al. Development of a metabolomic radiation signature in urine from patients undergoing total body irradiation. Radiation Res. 2014;181(4):350-361.
  4. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  5. Navari RM. Nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020;21:1-10.
  6. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  7. Thomson DJ, Palma D, Guckenberger M, et al. Practice recommendations for risk-adapted head and neck cancer radiation therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: An ASTRO-ESTRO consensus statement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107(4):618-627.
  8. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  9. Chen G, Han Y, Zhang H, et al. Radiotherapy-induced digestive injury: Diagnosis, treatment and mechanisms. Front Oncol. 2021;11:757973.
  10. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  11. May JE, Donaldson C, Gynn L, et al. Chemotherapy-induced genotoxic damage to bone marrow cells: long-term implications. Mutagenesis. 2018;33(3):241-251.
  12. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  13. Mukai-Sasaki Y, Liao Z, Yang D, et al. Modulators of radiation-induced cardiopulmonary toxicities for non-small cell lung cancer: Integrated cytokines, single nucleotide variants, and HBP systems imaging. Front Oncol. 2022;12:984364.
  14. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  15. Machado AAP, Maia PM, Tannous CQ, et al. Radiation therapy with elective lymph node irradiation for breast cancer: dosimetric study and impact on cardiovascular risk and second neoplasms. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2021;67(8):1118-1123.
  16. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

  17. Hassan SM, Obeid HA, Hasan IS, et al. Etanercept Ameliorated cerebral Damage During Global Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Male Rats. Azerbaijan Pharm Pharmacother J. 2023;22(1):53-58.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Abbas Al-Huseini LM, Al-Mudhaffer RH, Hassan SM, et al. DMF ameliorating cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in Male Rats. Sys Rev Pharm. 2019;10(1):206-213.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref, Indexed at

Author Info

Wisam Hashim Baqer1, Ali A. Obais2, Entsar Hadi Jawad3 and Saif M. Hassan1*
 
1Department of Pharmacy, Al-Zarawi University College, Karbala, Iraq
2Department of Anesthesia, College of Medical and Health Technique, Awa University, AL-Muthanna, Iraq
3College of Pharmacy, Al-Zahraa University for Women, Karbala, Iraq
 

Copyright:This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.